Only five users?

8 Aug

What do you mean we only need to test with five users? Are you mad? We’re used to doing research with hundreds and thousands of users, how can you possibly suggest that five users are enough?

Ok, so I may have dramatised this a little, but we’ve had many similar conversations over the years we’ve been doing usability. It crops up on a regular basis, so we thought it was about time we anticipated the question and dealt with it here on our blog.

 

Usability research is not like other types of market research

It’s easy to see how clients can feel that five users are only a drop in the ocean when they are used to dealing with higher numbers of respondents. But this is the point. Usability research is very different to other forms of market research. Most forms of market research deal with opinion gathering. What do customers think and feel about this brand?, How do they feel about the service we are offering?, and What do they perceive our brand to offer over competitors… When dealing with opinions, clearly five people isn’t going to cut it, you need hundreds to get a meaningful measure.

Most of the usability research we conduct is designed to identify problems with a website. We’re asked ‘Why is my service not converting as well as I was expecting?’, ‘Why do users drop out at this point?’, and ‘What can we do to encourage more users to register?’… We’re asked to find problems our clients know exist somewhere in the site, and to help them fix them. It’s not about what people think or feel, it’s about observing user behaviour and isolating problems with the service.

 

How many times do you need to see a problem occur?

The great thing about searching for problems is that when you spot them you usually know it. If the zip breaks on your trousers it’s obvious there’s a problem. If you spill your coffee, spot a dent in your car… The problems are obvious. Finding problems with a website or service isn’t so clear cut, but when you watch someone struggle to complete a task because of the way it is designed, irrespective of the user’s level of skill or experience, you usually know you’ve uncovered an issue.

Let’s say we’ve just observed a user get very confused with your online checkout process. You’re pretty sure you have an issue which may be preventing people from buying. To be sure you test another person and they struggle in the same place. Then another person hits the same barrier. How many do you need to see before you’re convinced? Another 5 people? 10 more? 100? Do you need it to be statistically significant before you’re convinced?

What about discovering problems elsewhere? Let’s say you’ve noticed a couple of people trip on a kink in the carpet outside your office, or you’ve spotted a couple of people slipping up on some wet marble flooring. How many more people do you need to see hurt themselves before you’re willing to fix it?

 

Testing with more than 5 users results in diminishing returns

Sure you can test with more people, and there is a chance that you won’t uncover any issues until your 6th or 7th user. But it is very unlikely if you’ve designed your tests to cover the core areas of the service. What is more likely is that by your 6th user you’ll start to see the same patterns of behaviour repeat over and over, and your value from the tests start to diminish.

You may have seen the great diagram put forward by Jakob Nielsen to show the diminishing returns of testing with more than five users.

We agree with this entirely, and what many people forget about the accompanying article http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html  is that he advocates testing with five people, fixing the issues, and then testing again. This is very much the way we like to work. We encourage many clients, who come to us with plans to recruit 15/20 people, to reduce their scope and break the project into chunks that allow for design changes to be made before new users are brought in.

You don’t need high numbers of users to identify usability problems. Don’t confuse usability research with other types of market research. If you want to gauge opinions about competing brands, then five people isn’t anywhere near enough. But if you want to identify barriers to purchasing on your website five users is usually enough.

So, are you convinced? Are five users enough?

 

 

Liked this article?

Get more usability insights straight to your inbox

  • We promise no spam, just straight up great insights from our UX experts!

 

 

Damian Rees

About Damian Rees

Damian has worked as a usability and user experience consultant for over 13 years. He has worked in senior roles within companies like the BBC and National Air Traffic Services where he has researched and designed for users in a variety of different contexts including web applications, voice recognition, and air traffic control interfaces. Follow Damian on twitter @damianrees

  • http://twitter.com/intuitionhq @intuitionhq

    Interesting blog post. I think the 5 user thing is pretty relative to what kind of testing you are doing, and thus your costs for testing.

    When we do in-person testing we generally aim for that 5 user mark, but when we do remote testing (which is the majority of the time, since we have our our testing tool) it's not uncommon to get hundreds or even thousands of users taking our tests online.

    I think the key is carefully considering what you want to test, and the best way to ask your testing questions in order to get the most effective, relevant results for your site. Often 5 users is enough, but having more and seeing trends develop in your testing results is really very helpful as well.